구강악안면외과 환자의 전신 마취에 있어서 흡입 마취와 정맥 마취의 차이에 대한 임상적 고찰
A Clinical Study about Comparison of Inhalation Anesthesia and Intravenous Anesthesia in Oral and Maxillofacial Patients
김진, 이미정, 송현철,
소속 상세정보
김진 ( Kim Jin ) - 가톨릭대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과
이미정 ( Lee Mi-Joung ) - 가톨릭대학교 의과대학 치과학교실 구강악안면외과
송현철 ( Song Hyun-Chul ) - 가톨릭대학교 성빈센트병원 치과 구강악안면외과
KMID : 0980220020020010015
Abstract
Intravenous anesthesia was compared with inhalation anesthesia in 20 patients of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups so that 20 patients were injected ketamine and propofol and 20 patients were administered enflurane.
The hemodynamic responses of patients and recovery profile of the two groups were compared.
Intravenous anesthesia group awoke significantly faster than inhalation anesthesia after operation.
Time to full recovery in intravenous anesthesia group was significantly shorter than that of inhalation anesthesia group.
We conclude that intravenous anesthesia is a practical technique for oral and maxillofacial surgery patients and intravenous anesthesia may be more preferable because of the significant shortness of recovery time.
키워드
Enflurane; Intravenous anesthesia; Inhalation anesthesia; Ketamine; Propofol
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보